Goldman Sachs Cautions on US Stocks: Geopolitical Momentum Stalls, Asymmetric Downside Risk from CTAs Emerges

Deep News
Jun 20

US stocks concluded a four-trading-day week with a sharp rally into Friday's holiday and options expiration, with AI-related themes once again serving as the primary upward catalyst. However, Goldman Sachs' One-Delta trading desk warns that geopolitical momentum is stalling, and structural risks within the market have quietly accumulated.

The US-Iran nuclear negotiations saw a reversal, with Switzerland confirming the cancellation of talks originally scheduled for this Friday. US Vice President Vance also postponed related travel. Rich Privorotsky, head of Goldman Sachs' One-Delta trading desk, noted that geopolitical momentum is slowing significantly, and the oil market's pricing of expectations for increased Iranian supply faces growing uncertainty.

Concurrently, the AI race narrative continues to intensify. The launch of China's AI star Zhipu's open-source flagship model GLM-5.2 did not dampen enthusiasm for tech stocks; instead, it further underscored the necessity for increased spending by hyperscale cloud providers, with hardware suppliers continuing to benefit.

From a technical perspective, low-to-neutral sentiment indicators combined with leverage effects this week significantly amplified volatility in the AI and tech sectors. Goldman Sachs warns that a downside asymmetric structure for Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA) strategies has formed, while uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve's policy framework and rising volatility in the bond market also warrant attention.

US-Iran Negotiation Setbacks: Oil Price Geopolitical Premium Not Fully Priced

This week saw a notable shift in the geopolitical landscape. The Swiss Foreign Ministry confirmed the cancellation of US-Iran talks on nuclear issues and other matters scheduled for Friday in Switzerland. Vance's postponed trip further indicates the negotiations are at an impasse. Israel's ongoing military operations in Lebanon constitute a key friction point, with Iran reportedly demanding that the US first concretely implement commitments from a memorandum of understanding signed on Wednesday before re-engaging in talks.

The market is still pricing a path for incremental Iranian crude to return, but the political backdrop is becoming increasingly complex—criticism from Republicans within the US and dissatisfaction from Israel both pressure the negotiation outlook.

Rich Privorotsky pointed out:

"The core issue is a lack of trust: if Iran fully resumes exports and eliminates the oil risk premium, it means voluntarily giving up its most significant bargaining chip."

"The market is pricing physical crude oil but has not fully discounted this trust deficit and the continued deterioration of the (US-Iran) agreement momentum."

It is this logic that makes the Iranian government inclined towards a slower, phased implementation approach rather than an immediate, full return. Current market pricing for physical barrels does not fully reflect this trust deficit and the ongoing weakening of deal momentum, suggesting the related risk premium may be underestimated.

AI Race Logic Intensifies, Hardware Makers Are Primary Beneficiaries

The AI theme remained the market's strongest driver this week. Goldman Sachs' thematic indices for Robotics & Automation, Memory, and AI Semiconductors all hit new highs. In contrast, the S&P 500 ex-AI Index closed down 56 basis points on Thursday, widening the divergence. Intel surged 10% in a single day, sparked by unconfirmed reports it might secure Apple manufacturing orders.

Regarding the AI investment thesis, Privorotsky offered a noteworthy perspective: the significance of new Chinese models like GLM-5.2 extends beyond pushing down computing costs or fostering fiercer competition. Their deeper impact lies in reinforcing the intrinsic necessity for US tech giants to increase their investments. Paradoxically, Chinese competition is strengthening the imperative for AI spending among various parties.

Although the latest generation of models appears technically to rely more on reinforcement learning and post-training techniques, reducing dependence on massive pre-training compute, the fundamental logic of the AI race remains unchanged. If the perceived gap between overseas/Chinese and US frontier models shrinks from about a year to a few months, the motivation to accelerate investment would significantly increase.

Intensified competition may ultimately elevate, not compress, the overall scale of AI investment. In this sense, hyperscale cloud providers remain the financiers of this race, while hardware manufacturers are the primary beneficiaries.

Technical Setup Nearly "Perfect" But Approaching Climax

From a technical structure perspective, this week presented a rare resonance pattern. Privorotsky noted that, technically, this week's environment was close to a perfect setup for positioning and could arguably be described as having reached a climax.

Low-to-neutral sentiment indicators—the Bull-Bear indicator remained in neutral territory, and the CNN Fear & Greed Index hovered around 30 due to extremely poor market breadth—combined with expiration effects and the ongoing influence of leverage, collectively amplified price swings in AI and tech sectors. The same market mechanisms that accelerated the decline weeks ago are now operating in reverse.

However, the structural underpinnings of this rally are not solid: significant downside asymmetry currently exists in CTAs, combined with post-expiration gamma roll... Institutional sentiment remains subdued, but retail leverage is extremely high. This implies that if momentum reverses, downside could open up rapidly.

Fed Uncertainty Persists, Bond Volatility Carries Upside Risk

On the macro front, this week's Federal Reserve meeting also cannot be ignored. Although Middle East geopolitics dominated the market narrative, the Fed's influence was still difficult to completely overlook this week.

The interest rate curve showed a pronounced flattening trend, with front-end SOFR pricing continuing to shift lower. A few cross-asset relationships have begun to show signs of disconnection—the historical linkage between copper prices and the Nasdaq is one example; the divergence between the small-cap Russell 2000 index and the SFRZ6 (the 3-month SOFR futures contract expiring in December 2026) is another. These signals warrant attention.

A more critical policy-level variable is the effectiveness of forward guidance. This week featured the first FOMC monetary policy meeting under new Fed Chair Wash. The post-meeting FOMC statement removed the interest rate forward guidance.

A Fed policy framework stripped of substantive forward guidance will introduce greater uncertainty and ultimately push bond market volatility higher. For fixed income investors, this signifies a structural change in the pricing logic for interest rate risk, the impact of which has not yet been fully reflected in the markets.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10